The “Abrahamic Lie” — How Islam Uses Unity Language to Reject Unity Entirely
Introduction: Unity on the Surface, Supremacy Underneath
At first glance, phrases like:
-
“Abrahamic religions”
-
“People of the Book”
-
“Common ground”
...sound like a call to tolerance, peace, and interfaith respect. But dig one layer beneath, and you find something else entirely:
“Islam abrogates everything before it.”
“Judaism and Christianity are false.”
“The phrase ‘Abrahamic religions’ is dangerous, deceptive, and part of a global conspiracy.”
This is not coexistence.
This is soft theocracy wrapped in polite vocabulary — and then dropped for fire and brimstone when questioned.
Let’s dismantle the whole foundation of this ideology — brick by brick.
1. Islam Acknowledges Abraham, But Rejects His Legacy
Muslims claim:
“We follow the religion of Abraham — tawhid (monotheism).”
Yet they:
-
Reject the covenantal structure of Genesis 12–22
-
Deny the unique sonship of Isaac
-
Replace the sacrificial son with Ishmael (without a single verse from the Quran naming him)
-
Claim Abraham was a Muslim — centuries before Islam ever existed
Islam doesn’t honor Abraham. It rewrites him.
It's not shared legacy. It's historical appropriation.
2. The Phrase “Abrahamic Religions” Is Not Bridge-Building — It’s Blasphemy to Islam
According to this fatwa:
Using the phrase "Abrahamic religions" is a slippery slope that:
-
Distorts tawhid
-
Equates truth and falsehood
-
Is part of a Zionist-Christian plot for global domination
-
Ends with Muslims being deceived, diluted, and destroyed
You read that right.
The phrase isn’t just wrong — it’s described as a spiritual virus intended to:
-
Undermine Islamic authority
-
Blend Islam into a pluralistic stew
-
Strip Muslims of their distinctiveness
-
Lead to total control by Jews, Christians, and secular powers
That’s not concern for theological purity.
That’s paranoid supremacy doctrine dressed as piety.
3. Islam Claims to Recognize All Prophets — While Calling Jews and Christians Liars
The Quran says:
“We make no distinction between the prophets.” (Surah 2:136)
But the fatwa clarifies:
-
Jews are liars who rejected prophets
-
Christians are polytheists who invented divinity for Jesus
-
Only Muslims truly honor Abraham, Moses, and Jesus
-
Everyone else distorted the message
So what’s really going on?
Islam uses names from the Bible — then empties them of meaning and replaces the message.
Jesus becomes “Isa,” who:
-
Never died
-
Never claimed to be God
-
Never rose from the dead
-
Will return to destroy Christianity and submit to Sharia
That’s not shared heritage. That’s theological erasure.
4. Islam’s Doctrine of Abrogation Is the Death of Coexistence
Surah 3:85:
“Whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him.”
This is not figurative.
This is used to:
-
Reject salvation outside Islam
-
Damn all Jews and Christians who don’t convert
-
Nullify all previous revelations, calling them corrupt or canceled
-
Justify da’wah campaigns as the only legitimate interfaith engagement
That’s not tolerance.
That’s doctrinal monopoly backed by divine ultimatum.
5. Sectarianism in Islam Is Blamed on “People,” But Not the Quran Itself
Ironically, while rejecting “unity of religions,” the fatwa admits:
Islam itself is full of division — sects like Sunni, Shia, Sufi, Kharijite
But instead of examining the Quran’s internal contradictions or hadith chaos, they blame:
-
"Egotistical scholars"
-
"Foreign ideas"
-
"Enemies infiltrating Islam"
It’s always the other — never the doctrine.
Yet the Quran:
-
Speaks of seven ahruf (modes) and variant readings
-
Has verses abrogated by others (naskh)
-
Contains language so ambiguous it spawned centuries of tafsir disagreements
Division is not a bug. It’s a feature of a system built on evolving, situational revelation.
6. When You Say “Abrahamic,” They Hear “Submission to Secularism”
The fatwa insists:
Interfaith language is part of a Western, liberal, globalist plot.
They claim it aims to:
-
Normalize Christianity and Judaism
-
Break Muslim moral resistance
-
Spread usury, immorality, and Western law
-
Lead to domination of the Arab world by non-Muslims
It’s a full-spectrum conspiracy theory, not a theological argument.
Instead of dialogue, it demands:
Absolute dominance of Islam, full rejection of Christianity and Judaism, and isolation from the modern pluralistic world
It isn’t just defensive.
It’s expansionist paranoia.
7. Their Final Warning: Submit or Be Deceived
The fatwa ends with the call:
“It is not permissible to describe anyone today as being a Jew or Christian and still rightly guided.”
Translation?
-
No salvation outside Islam
-
No valid truth in any other faith
-
No such thing as shared Abrahamic roots
-
Anyone using interfaith language is at best misled, at worst a traitor
This isn’t just exclusive theology.
It’s an absolute rejection of religious diversity and mutual respect.
Conclusion: When Unity Is Framed as Apostasy
This fatwa exposes the core of exclusivist Islam:
-
It doesn't want dialogue — it wants dominance
-
It doesn’t aim for understanding — it seeks conversion
-
It doesn’t tolerate other paths — it labels them as misguidance or shirk
-
It doesn’t see “Abrahamic” as shared history — it sees it as infiltration
So the next time someone says,
“Islam respects Judaism and Christianity — we’re all Abrahamic!”
Ask them if they’ve read this fatwa.
Because behind the PR language lies the truth:
Coexistence isn’t the goal. Supremacy is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the Author
Mauao Man is a blog created by a New Zealand writer who believes in following the evidence wherever it leads. From history and religion to culture and society, Mauao Man takes a clear, critical, and honest approach — challenging ideas without attacking people. Whether exploring the history of Islam in New Zealand, the complexities of faith, or the contradictions in belief systems, this blog is about asking the hard questions and uncovering the truth.
