Contextual Understanding of Jihad

Traditional View: Dual Aspects of Jihad

In early Islamic jurisprudence, the concept of jihad was understood in two primary forms:

1. Greater Jihad (Al-Jihad al-Akbar): Refers to the internal, spiritual struggle against one’s own desires, sins, and shortcomings. It is a personal and moral effort to attain piety and righteousness.

2. Lesser Jihad (Al-Jihad al-Asghar): Refers to the external struggle, which could include armed combat to defend the Muslim community (ummah) against aggression or oppression. This form of jihad is often associated with military conflict.

Classical Islamic scholars, such as those from the four Sunni schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali), provided detailed rulings on the conduct of jihad, including:

• Justification: Jihad was permitted primarily for defense or to protect the Muslim community.

• Conduct: Rules of engagement were established, such as prohibiting harm to non-combatants, women, children, and religious clerics.

• Authority: Only a legitimate Muslim ruler could declare jihad.

These understandings were based on Quranic verses such as:

• Quran 2:190:
  "Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not like transgressors."

• Quran 9:29:
  "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful..."

• Quran 22:39:
  "Permission to fight is given to those who are being fought, because they have been wronged."

These verses, in their traditional interpretation, were understood as divine commands for the Muslim community to defend itself against external threats.

---

Contemporary Reevaluations: A Contextual Approach

In modern times, many Islamic scholars have reexamined the concept of jihad, focusing on its spiritual, ethical, and contextual aspects. They argue that:

• Jihad is primarily spiritual: The greater jihad (struggle against the self) is emphasized as the core meaning of jihad, while the lesser jihad (armed struggle) is seen as a secondary and conditional aspect.

• Historical Context Matters: Many of the verses related to military jihad are understood to be context-specific, revealed during periods when the early Muslim community in Medina was under threat from hostile tribes or empires.

• Conditional Warfare: Even when military jihad is permitted, it is strictly regulated, and its primary purpose is defensive rather than offensive. Aggression, excessive violence, and targeting civilians are strictly prohibited.

• Global Ethics: Scholars argue that the universal ethical principles of Islam, such as justice, mercy, and the protection of human dignity, take precedence over any specific historical commands.

Key Quranic verses often cited in this modern understanding include:

• Quran 5:32:
  "Whoever kills an innocent soul—it is as if he has killed all of humanity. And whoever saves one—it is as if he has saved all of humanity."

• Quran 60:8:
  "Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes—from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly."

---

Scholars Advocating Contextual Understanding

Several contemporary scholars have emphasized this contextual understanding:

• Muhammad Abduh (1849–1905): The Egyptian reformer argued that jihad must be understood in light of its moral purpose—protecting the oppressed and ensuring justice.

• Fazlur Rahman (1919–1988): A Pakistani-American scholar who highlighted the ethical principles of the Quran and argued that jihad should always aim for peace and justice.

• Tariq Ramadan: A Swiss-Egyptian scholar who stresses that the spiritual and moral aspects of jihad must take precedence over any militant interpretations.

• Yusuf al-Qaradawi: A prominent Egyptian scholar who, while accepting the legitimacy of defensive jihad, emphasized that aggression is prohibited and that jihad must always align with ethical principles.

• Hamza Yusuf: An American Islamic scholar who has emphasized that the term "jihad" has been misunderstood and misused by extremists and that its primary meaning is spiritual struggle.

---

Logical and Theological Justifications

Proponents of the contextual understanding of jihad base their views on several key arguments:

• Ethical Priority: Islam's ethical principles (justice, mercy, and peace) are universal and must guide all interpretations of jihad.

• Historical Specificity: Verses of the Quran revealed in the context of warfare (such as during the battles of Badr, Uhud, and the conquest of Mecca) should be understood within their specific historical context.

• Prophet Muhammad’s Conduct: The Prophet’s interactions with his enemies, including his clemency at the conquest of Mecca, are viewed as evidence of a preference for peace and forgiveness.

• Divine Prohibition of Aggression: The Quran’s clear prohibition of transgression in warfare (Quran 2:190) is cited as a foundational principle.

---

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Those who reject this modern, contextual interpretation argue that:

• Classical Jurisprudence is Clear: The traditional rules of jihad, as defined by the four Sunni schools, should not be reinterpreted based on modern sensibilities.

• Islam’s Universality: Some traditional scholars maintain that jihad can be used to establish Islamic governance over non-Muslim lands, viewing it as a divine mandate.

• Risk of Dilution: Overemphasizing the spiritual aspect of jihad may weaken the Muslim community’s ability to defend itself.

• Literalism: Groups such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda have exploited a literal, militant interpretation of jihad to justify terrorism, rejecting the modern contextual approach.

---

Modern Applications and Peacebuilding

The contextual understanding of jihad has led to several modern applications:

• Educational Campaigns: Scholars like Hamza Yusuf and Tariq Ramadan have led educational initiatives to clarify the true meaning of jihad.

• Interfaith Dialogue: Emphasizing the spiritual and peaceful aspects of jihad has facilitated better relations between Muslim and non-Muslim communities.

• Counter-Terrorism: Many Muslim-majority countries, such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia, have promoted this understanding to combat extremist narratives.

• Humanitarian Initiatives: Jihad is often redefined as a struggle to alleviate suffering, fight poverty, and promote education.

---

Conclusion: A Continuing Debate

The reinterpretation of jihad is a central issue in modern Islamic thought. It reflects a broader struggle between traditionalist literalism and contextualist ethical approaches. While extremist groups misuse jihad to justify violence, mainstream Muslim scholars emphasize its spiritual, defensive, and ethical dimensions.