Mauao Man

Myth 13: “The Qur’an Contains Scientific Miracles”

📉 The Reality: The Qur’an Contains Pre-Scientific Errors, Not Miracles

Modern apologists claim the Qur’an contains scientific insights that predate modern discovery. In reality, the so-called “scientific miracles” are often vague, plagiarized from earlier Greek or Persian sources, or outright scientifically false. These claims collapse under scrutiny, revealing a text grounded in 7th-century cosmology and embryology, not divine omniscience.

🧬 I. Embryology: Borrowed Errors, Not Divine Insight

Muslims often cite Qur’an 23:12–14, claiming it accurately describes human embryonic development. Let’s examine that.

“We created man from a drop of fluid… then a clinging clot (‘alaqah)… then a lump (‘mudghah’)...”

🔍 Problems:

‘Alaqah = blood clot or leech? Either way, scientifically wrong. An embryo is never a blood clot.
Mudghah = chewed substance? Apologists use vague metaphor to retrofit science.
Entire sequence misses key stages like gastrulation and organogenesis.
Aristotle and Galen made similar claims centuries earlier, and Galen even used "clot" and "chewed lump" — suspiciously similar to Qur’anic terms.

This is not a revelation — it’s plagiarized ancient embryology, filtered through poetic metaphor.

💦 II. Qur’an 86:6–7 — Semen from Between the Backbone and Ribs?

“He is created from a fluid, emitted from between the backbone and the ribs.”

📉 This is biologically absurd:

Semen is produced in the testes, which are nowhere near the ribs.
“Backbone and ribs” refers to the chest cavity, not reproductive organs.
No modern medical authority supports this anatomical nonsense.

Muslim apologists scramble to reinterpret this verse metaphorically or claim it refers to "origin" — but that’s retrofitting, not revelation.

🌌 III. Cosmology Errors: Stars as Missiles?

Qur’an 67:5 —

“We have adorned the nearest heaven with lamps (stars), and made them missiles for driving away devils…”

🔍 Let’s be blunt:

Stars are massive burning spheres of gas, not anti-demon projectiles.
The idea that shooting stars are weapons against “devils” is mythological, not scientific.
Shooting stars (meteors) are small space rocks burning up in Earth’s atmosphere — not actual stars.

This is 7th-century Arabian folklore, echoed in other verses (e.g., Qur’an 15:18, 37:6-10).

🌍 IV. The Earth Is Spread Out and Flat?

Qur’an 15:19 —

“And the Earth We have spread out...”

Qur’an 88:20 —

“And at the Earth — how it is spread out?”

Qur’an 2:22, 71:19, 78:6 — all repeat the theme: Earth as a “bed,” “carpet,” or “spread.”

🔍 Problem:

Apologists claim this means “accessible” or “habitable.”
But classical tafsir (e.g., Al-Tabari, Al-Qurtubi) took it literally — the Earth is flat and spread out.
Nowhere does the Qur’an describe Earth’s spherical shape, orbit, or axial rotation.

The Qur’an reflects a flat Earth cosmology consistent with its time.

☀️ V. Sun Sets in a Muddy Spring?

Qur’an 18:86 —

“He found it setting in a muddy spring…”

This refers to Dhul-Qarnayn watching the sun set.

🔍 Excuses include:

“It’s just from his point of view.”
“It’s metaphorical.”

But:

Classical tafsir (Ibn Kathir, Al-Tabari) understood this literally.
It’s not phrased as an illusion or metaphor.
A divine book shouldn’t convey cosmological falsehoods, even as "descriptions."

📡 VI. Other “Miracle” Claims? Vague or False

Claim	Reality
Expansion of the universe (Qur’an 51:47)	The verse says “We built the heaven with might” — not a clear reference to cosmic expansion. Only modern science forced that interpretation.
Barrier between salt and fresh water (Qur’an 55:19-20)	Known by earlier civilizations; natural salinity gradients (haloclines) — not miraculous. No mention of density, salinity, or oceanography.
Iron sent down from heaven (Qur’an 57:25)	Iron does have extraterrestrial origin — but “sent down” is also used for clothing and cattle (Qur’an 39:6, 16:5). Not a scientific statement.

🔬 VII. Scientific Method vs. Apologetic Cherry-Picking

Let’s be clear:

A real scientific miracle would include specific, testable, accurate predictions centuries ahead of their time.
Qur’anic verses are ambiguous, metaphorical, or wrong.
Retroactive reinterpretation = confirmation bias, not evidence.

You cannot call it miraculous when:

The “discovery” depends on the reader’s imagination.
Earlier cultures (Greek, Hindu, Babylonian) had similar or better science.

❌ Final Analysis: Science in the Qur’an Is a Modern PR Campaign — Not Revelation

Claim Type	Reality
Embryology	Ancient Greek plagiarism
Anatomy	Anatomically false (86:6-7)
Cosmology	Stars as missiles = folklore
Astronomy	Flat Earth and sun in muddy spring
Earth Sciences	Vague metaphors, not insight

🚫 Conclusion: No Scientific Miracles — Just Primitive Misunderstanding

The Qur’an doesn’t reveal modern science. It mirrors the flawed cosmology and embryology of 7th-century Arabia, and borrows from Greek and Persian thought. Attempts to shoehorn modern science into its verses are an exercise in intellectual dishonesty and desperation.

If this is supposed to be divine revelation, then God got science very, very wrong.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the Author

Mauao Man is a blog created by a New Zealand writer who believes in following the evidence wherever it leads. From history and religion to culture and society, Mauao Man takes a clear, critical, and honest approach — challenging ideas without attacking people. Whether exploring the history of Islam in New Zealand, the complexities of faith, or the contradictions in belief systems, this blog is about asking the hard questions and uncovering the truth.