Mauao Man

Thursday, May 29, 2025

If Muhammad Couldn't Establish a Stable Moral Code, Can Islam Claim Moral Universality?

The Crisis of Consistency in Islam’s Moral Framework

Islam claims to be a universal, final revelation offering the definitive moral system for all humanity. But a closer examination of its central figure—Muhammad himself—reveals a deep contradiction: far from offering a clear and consistent moral code, his actions and revelations often appear inconsistent, self-serving, or morally questionable.

❓ If Muhammad, as the “best example” (Qur’an 33:21), didn’t establish a stable moral framework, on what basis can Islam claim moral universality?

⚔️ 1. A Prophet in Moral Flux?

Throughout Muhammad’s life, we see shifting moral standards:

Early Meccan verses preach peace, patience, and tolerance (Q 109:6: “To you your religion, to me mine.”)
Later Medinan verses call for violence, subjugation, and punishment (Q 9:5: “Kill the polytheists wherever you find them.”)

This is not merely a response to context—it’s a seismic moral shift.

A prophet claiming to speak for eternity should not oscillate morally depending on his political power.

🧬 2. Revelations That Match Desires

Critics and even early skeptics noticed a disturbing pattern: revelations often seemed to conveniently align with Muhammad’s personal needs.

Qur’an 33:37 justifies his marriage to his adopted son’s wife
Qur’an 66:1–5 rebukes him for trying to please his wives and grants him divine exemption
Qur’an 33:50 allows him more wives than any of his followers
Qur’an 8:1, 8:41 divides war booty with him getting a privileged share

Is this divine legislation—or personal preference elevated to divine law?

🤝 3. Morality by Double Standards

The Qur’an frequently holds Muhammad to a different standard:

He could have more wives (Q 33:50)
His mistakes were pre-forgiven (Q 48:2)
He was exempted from common restrictions

A universal moral code cannot rest on a two-tiered system—one for the prophet, another for everyone else.

If morality isn’t universal in application, it isn’t morality. It’s favoritism.

🕌 4. Islamic Schools Can’t Agree on What’s Moral

To this day, Muslims remain deeply divided on moral questions:

Was mut’ah (temporary marriage) sanctioned or abolished?
Is slavery permanently allowed or historically contextual?
Are apostates to be killed or left free?
Is jihad defensive only, or offensive too?

The Qur’an and hadith give ambiguous or contradictory signals, and scholars admit: Muhammad’s actions don’t always resolve the ambiguity.

A prophet who allegedly brought the “clear guidance” (Q 2:2) shouldn’t leave behind moral chaos.

📉 5. The Legacy of Unstable Ethics

The fallout of this unstable moral model is visible:

Intra-Muslim violence justified by conflicting interpretations of Muhammad’s model
Terrorists and reformers alike quote the Prophet to defend opposing views
A global ummah that cannot agree on what Muhammad actually taught or permitted

Can such instability really be divine?

Christianity says: “Imitate Christ.”
Islam says: “Imitate Muhammad.”
But which Muhammad—the warlord, the peacemaker, the polygamist, the lawgiver?

🧩 6. The Inescapable Conclusion

If the moral standard of a religion rests on a single man’s life, that life must be morally exemplary, consistent, and timelessly relevant.

But Muhammad’s life is morally controversial
His legacy is internally divisive
His revelations are often reactive and self-interested

This is not the hallmark of a universal moral lawgiver. It’s the pattern of a man elevated beyond his actions by dogma, not merit.

🔍 Bottom Line:

If Muhammad couldn’t establish a clear, timeless moral standard, then Islam can’t claim to offer one either.